Read from the papers recently about the education plans govt has or is thinking for the people…which makes me think about the role of education in the first place.
In The Aristos by John Fowles (written in 1968), he wrote in Chapter 9 – A New Education
1. At present almost all our education is directed to two ends: to get wealth for the state and to gain a livelihood for the individual. It is therefore little wonder that society is money-obsessed, since the whole tenor of education seems to indicate that this obsession is both normal and desirable.
2. In spite of the fact that we now have almost universal education, we are qualitatively one of the least-educated ages, precisely because education has everywhere surrendered to economic need. Relatively far better educations were received by the fortunate few in the eighteen century; in the Renaissance, in ancient Rome and Greece. The aims of education in all those periods were far superior to our own; they opened the student admirably to the understanding and enjoyment of life and to his responsibilities towards society. Of course the facts and subjects of the old classical education are largely unnecessary to us today; and of course it was the product of a highly unjust economic situation, but at its best it arrived at something none of our present systems remotely approach: the rounded human being.
3. ...
And in a Newsweek article dated August 2006, Martha Nussbaum wrote:We live in a world that is dominated by the profit motive – which suggests to concerned citizens that education in science and technology is crucially important to the future success of their nations. I have no objection to good scientific and technical education, and I don’t wish to suggest that nations should stop trying to improve it. But I worry that other abilities, equally crucial, are at risk of getting lost in the competitive flurry. The abilities associated with the humanities and the arts are also vital, both to the health of individual nations and to the creation of a decent world culture. These include the ability to think critically, to transcend local loyalties and to approach international problems as a “citizen of the world.” And, perhaps most important, the ability to imagine sympathetically the predicament of another person…in short, an education that cultivates human beings rather than producing useful machines. If we do not insist on the crucial importance of the humanities and the arts, they will drop away. They don’t make money. But they do something far more precious: they make a world worth living in.
Some 40 years ago and now, we are still facing the same issue. We are well aware of the fact that education is supposed to ‘cultivate’ a well-rounded human being not only to serve economically but also as a humane human being. But the scale has always been tilting to one end.
Recall the recent coverage on underpaid and under-appreciated social workers…and also the recent news about some students getting 4 straight As, yet they feel upset about it (their concern lies in the number of As they can achieve and the type of scholarship they can be awarded (local vs. foreign uni). But what about the majority of the JC students?).
SIGH, need to remind myself we are living in the ME era. ME has been taught to study hard, so that ME can earn more money (of cos, ME also want to earn more money) and ME can have a better life. It’s all about ME. Gee...what have we become?
3 comments:
I so agree with you lor. And you know what, when I was talking to my insurance agent about financial planning for kids just the other day, they assume we will plan for Uni education for our kids, using what we know about Uni today.
Com' on we talking about 20 yrs fr. now. I dun even know what the world will be like in 10 yrs lor, in 20 yrs, will the trend still be Uni education? Seriously..
And in my mind, I was envisaging my kids growing up to do what they want and not be slave to education cuz the stupid paper will get them some forever low paid job lor.
I so agree with both of you. Loved the passages about education. I want to add something I read the other day. This is from "On Being Human" by Erich Fromm. Chapter: Modern Man and the Future (1961)-- The priorities of the industrial system are balance, quantification and accounting. The question is always: What is worthwhile? What brings profit? It is necessary to ask such questions in the realm of industrial production. Yet the principles of accounting, of balance, and of profit were simultaneously applied to man and have expanded from economics to human life in toto. Man has become an enterprise: His life is his capital and his task seems to be to invest this capital as well as possible. If it is well invested, then he is successful. If he invests his life poorly, then he is without success. He himself thus becomes a thing, an object...
So, u ask what have we become? Objects. We are in the process of becoming objects instead of human. Because we are not learning how to be human. I hope I can do something about that before it is too late.
Thanks thanks to both for sharing ur thots :)
yes...u r rite. Objects we have become. Feelings we have less too. And emptiness in us is growing day by day. We really need to turn inwards, asking ourselves 'what makes us humans in the first place'...
Post a Comment